In this notebook, we are going to explore the meaning of the group delay $\tau_g$ and the phase delay $\tau_\phi$ of a filter. For this purpose, we will investigate the properties of a bandpass series RLC filter, due to its simplicity and wide applicability.

The group delay and phase delay of a filter are characterizations of its transfer function. Assume a filter with some arbitrary impulse response $h(t)$. We know, when a signal $x(t)$ is sent through the filter, the filter output $y(t)$ is given by

$$y(t)=h(t)*x(t),$$i.e. the impulse response is convolved with the input signal to yield the output signal. Now, to understand the group delay and phase delay, let us consider that the input signal $x(t)$ consists of a carrier wave with frequency $f_0$ and an envelope function $a(t)$:

$$x(t)=a(t)\sin(2\pi f_0t).$$Given that $a(t)$ changes much slower than its carrier, the output of the filter is approximately given by

$$y(t)=h(t)*x(t)\approx |H(f_0)| a(t-\tau_g)\sin(2\pi f_0(t-\tau_\phi)).$$Here, $\tau_g$ and $\tau_\phi$ denote the group and phase delay of the filter. This means, that an envelope function that is modulated with a given carrier frequency is delayed by the group delay $\tau_g$ and amplified by the frequency response of the filter at $f_0$ and the carrier itself is delayed by $\tau_\phi$.

Let us illustrate this in a more pictorial way. To be more specific, we will consider the following RLC circuit:

```
```

We can readily write the transfer function in the Laplace domain, given by

$$H(s)=\frac{U_{out}}{U_{in}}=\frac{R}{sL+\frac{1}{sC}+R}=\frac{sRC}{LCs^2+RCs+1}.$$With the substitution $\alpha=\frac{R}{2L}$ and $\omega_0=\frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}$ we get

$$H(s)=\frac{2\alpha s}{s^2+2\alpha s+\omega_0^2}$$as the overall transfer function. In this equation, $\omega_0$ determines the resonant frequency of the circuit (i.e. the center frequency of the bandpass filter) and $\alpha$ determines its Q-factor (i.e. the width of the bandpass).

Let us define some arbitrary values to yield the exemplary filter (*feel free to change the values, the graphs below adapt to these settings*):

```
f0 = 1e4 # The resonant frequency of the circuit
f1 = 5e3 # A second test frequency we are going to use below
alpha = 5000 # the damping factor
C = 1e-6 # define the capacitor value
# calculate the other parts of the circuit
L = 1/((2*np.pi*f0)**2*C)
R = 2*alpha*L
print ("R=%.2f Ohm" % R)
print ("L=%.2e Henry" % L)
print ("C=%.2e Farad" % C)
```

```
system = signal.TransferFunction([R*C, 0], [L*C, R*C, 1])
```

Let us plot the impulse response of this filter.

```
# the sampling frequency to simulate the time-continuous system in discrete time
Fs = 1e6
T = np.arange(0, 1e-3, 1/Fs)
t, h = signal.impulse2(system, T=T)
plt.plot(t*1000, h)
```

As we see, its an oscillating response, indicating that we indeed see a bandpass filter here. In particular, the impulse response contains 10 periods of oscillation within 1ms time, or of the frequency $10kHz$, which is exactly the resonance frequency we fixed above. Hence, we expect that a wave with frequency $10kHz$ is amplified with highest amplitude.

Let us therefore consider the frequency response of the filter, in terms of magnitude and phase:

```
# calculte frequency response
w, H = signal.freqresp(system, 2*np.pi*np.logspace(0, 6, 10000))
# find indices for both test frequencies and evaluate the amplitude
indf0 = np.argmin(abs(w-2*np.pi*f0))
indf1 = np.argmin(abs(w-2*np.pi*f1))
H0 = abs(H[indf0])
H1 = abs(H[indf1])
plt.subplot(121)
plt.semilogx(w/(2*np.pi), 20*np.log10(abs(H)))
plt.axvline(f0, color='r', ls='dashed')
plt.axvline(f1, ls='dashed')
plt.axhline(20*np.log10(H0), color='r', ls='dashed')
plt.axhline(20*np.log10(H1), ls='dashed')
plt.subplot(122)
plt.semilogx(w/(2*np.pi), np.angle(H))
print ("H(f0)=%.1fdB" % (20*np.log10(H0)))
print ("H(f1)=%.1fdB" % (20*np.log10(H1)))
```

As we see, for the resonance frequency, the gain is highest, whereas for other frequencies the gain decays with the distance to the resonance frequency. In particular, for the second test frequency $f_1$, we experience a gain of $-19.5dB$, which corresponds to $|H(f_1)|\approx 0.106$.

The group and phase delay depend on the phase spectrum of the frequency response of the filter, and are defined as follows:

$$\tau_g(\omega)=-\frac{d\angle H(\omega)}{d\omega}, \qquad \tau_\phi=-\frac{\angle H(\omega)}{\omega}.$$Hence, for the group delay, the quicker the phase changes, the higher is the group delay. So, we expect the group delay of our filter to be especially high for frequencies around the resonance frequency, since the phase changes quickly in this region.

In order to analyze group and phase delay, let us transform the continuous-time transfer function in Laplace-domain into the discrete-time transfer function in Z-domain. Here, we use the Bilinear transform, i.e. we replace $s$ in the Lapace-domain transfer function by $$s=\frac{2}{T}\frac{z-1}{z+1},$$ where $T=1/F_s$ is the sampling interval.

Let us employ `sympy`

for the tedious calculation. First, define the Laplace-domain transfer function $H(s)$:

```
from sympy import symbols
R_, L_, C_, s_, z_, T_ = symbols('R L C s z T')
Hs = (s_*R_*C_)/(s_**2*L_*C_+s_*R_*C_+1)
print ("H(s)=")
Hs
```

Then, substitute $s$ by the Bilinear transform, to yield the discrete-time version $H(z)$:

```
Hz = Hs.copy().subs(s_, 2/T_*(z_-1)/(z_+1))
print ("H(z)=")
Hz.cancel().collect(z_)
```

Even simpler, let `scipy`

do the continuous-time to discrete-time conversion directly for us:

```
systemD = signal.cont2discrete((system.num, system.den), 1/Fs, method='bilinear')
```

```
plt.subplot(121)
w=2*np.pi*np.linspace(100, 2e4, 50000)/Fs
_, gd = signal.group_delay(systemD[:2], w=w) # calculate group delay
_, H = signal.dfreqresp(systemD, w=w) # calculate frequency response
# calculate phase and group delay at the specific frequencies
indf0 = np.argmin(abs(w-2*np.pi*f0/Fs))
indf1 = np.argmin(abs(w-2*np.pi*f1/Fs))
tau_gf0 = gd[indf0]*1000/Fs
tau_gf1 = gd[indf1]*1000/Fs
tau_phif0 = (-np.angle(H[indf0])/w[indf0] /Fs*1000)
tau_phif1 = (-np.angle(H[indf1])/w[indf1] /Fs*1000)
plt.plot(w/(2*np.pi)*Fs, gd/Fs*1000)
plt.subplot(122)
plt.semilogy(w/(2*np.pi)*Fs, abs(np.angle(H)/w /Fs*1000));
print ("tau_g(f0)=%.2fms" % (tau_gf0))
print ("tau_phi(f0)=%.3fms" % tau_phif0)
print ("tau_g(f1)=%.2fms" % tau_gf1)
print ("tau_phi(f1)=%.3fms" % tau_phif1)
```

As we have expected when looking at the phase spectrum of the filter, the group delay reaches its maximum directly at the resonance frequency. For frequencies far away from the resonance frequency, the group delay is close to zero. The phase delay becomes zero at the resonance frequency, because the phase spectrum is zero at this frequency. For the phase delay at our second test frequency $f_1$, we measure a phase delay of $-0.047ms$.

Since now the expected values for phase and group delay were obtained, let's verify these values with a numeric evaluation. First, we define an envelope function that follows a Gaussian bell. Then, we create two signal `sig1`

and `sig2`

and modulate the envelope function with these:

```
T = 1e-2
t = np.arange(0, T, 1/Fs)
envelope = np.exp(-5e5*(t-T/2)**2)
sig1 = envelope * np.sin(2*np.pi*f0*t)
sig2 = envelope * np.sin(2*np.pi*f1*t)
plt.plot(t*1000, envelope, label='Envelope')
plt.plot(t*1000, sig1, label='Signal $x(t)$')
```

Now, let's send both signals through the system and record its output:

```
out1 = signal.dlsim(systemD, sig1)[1]
out2 = signal.dlsim(systemD, sig2)[1]
```

```
# Just some helper function for nicer frequency formatting
def toKilo(f):
if f % 1000 == 0:
return "%dk" % (f//1000)
else:
return ("%.1fk" % (f/1000))
```

```
def plotInputOutput():
plt.subplot(121)
plt.plot(t*1000, out1, 'b-', label='Output $y(t)$')
plt.plot(t*1000, sig1, 'r-', label='Input $x(t)$')
plt.plot(1000*t+.2, envelope*out1.max(), 'b-', lw=2)
plt.plot(t*1000, envelope, 'r-', lw=2)
plt.subplot(122)
plt.plot(t*1000, out2, 'b-', label='Output $y(t)$')
plt.plot(t*1000, sig2, 'r-', label='Input $x(t)$')
plt.plot(t*1000, envelope*out2.max(), 'b-', lw=2)
plt.plot(t*1000, envelope, 'r-', lw=2)
plotInputOutput()
```

```
plotInputOutput()
```

Apparently, for the left figure, the output envelope is delayed exactly by the group delay $\tau_g$ and the input and output-phases are synchronous to each other, indicating that the phase delay $\tau_\phi$ is zero for the resonance frequency. On the other hand, when considering our second test frequency $f_1$, we do not see a delay in the envelopes, but instead the phases are not synchronous. The difference between the maxima of the input and output sine waves is exactly the amount of the measured phase delay $\tau_\phi$.

Especially among digital filters, the term "linear-phase" filters is very common. A linear phase filter is a filter, where the phase of the filter depends linearly on the frequency. Accordingly, it has a constant group delay, i.e. the group delay is independent of the frequency. These filters have preferrable transmission properties, as they do not distort slowly the envelopes of input signal, which is often desired. Among analog filters built from RLC circuits, linear-phase filters are very rare.

The group delay $\tau_g$ and phase delay $\tau_\phi$ of a filter can be defined in terms of the behaviour of the filter on a specific type of input signal. Consider an input signal $x(t)=a(t)\sin(2\pi f t)$, where $a(t)$ is some slowly varying envelope function. Then, the output of the filter is approximately given by

$$y(t)=h(t)*x(t)\approx a(t-\tau_g(f))\cdot\sin(2\pi f(t-\tau_\phi(f)).$$I.e. the envelope function is delayed by the group delay, whereas the carrier is delayed by the phase delay.

Do you have questions or comments? Let's dicuss below!

DSPIllustrations.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, amazon.de, amazon.co.uk, amazon.it.